After removing the matrix band, you discover your class II amalgam has a large overhang. Which instrument would not be recommended for removing it?

Prepare for the Expanded Function Dental Assistant (EFDA) Board Test with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question is supported with detailed explanations to boost your confidence and understanding. Ace your EFDA exam!

In addressing the scenario of a large overhang on a class II amalgam restoration, it's essential to select the right instrument for effective overhang removal. The cleoid discoid carver, while commonly used for shaping and carving amalgam restorations, has a specific design that makes it less suitable for addressing large overhangs.

The cleoid discoid carver features pointed tips that are primarily designed for refining occlusal surfaces and creating fine details. These tips can be too sharp for safely and effectively removing significant amounts of amalgam, which requires a more controlled and flat surface to prevent damaging the adjacent tooth structure or the restoration itself.

In contrast, instruments like the Minnesota carver, sickle explorer, and Hollenback carver are better adapted for this task. They offer better control and are designed to remove excess material without compromising the integrity of the tooth structure or the restoration. Thus, the cleoid discoid carver is not recommended for removing a large overhang from a class II amalgam because its design does not facilitate the removal of larger amounts of material safely and effectively.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy